What Wins Olympic Medals? Not What Wins Headlines

On August 5, 2016, the Olympic Opening Ceremonies will take place in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil—come hell, high water, or a presidential impeachment. No matter how many times the mayor cries poor, the money will be found—and then the Games will begin. And other than a few random golfers, Olympians will attend, because Rio is where they’re handing out the medals.

So it’s time to stop raining on the Rio parade.

I’m not trying to downplay Rio’s many health and security risks, and I certainly wish that officials had delivered a true Olympic legacy, what five-time medalist Torben Grael called a “once in a lifetime opportunity,” by cleaning up Guanabara Bay. Instead, the focus has been reduced to a much shorter-term goal: keeping sailing’s field of play free of large, floating, and potentially race-altering debris.

USSTS Laser sailor in Rio test event for 2016 Olympics

But despite what we’re reading and watching, the most successful Olympians won’t call up Rio’s many huge challenges as excuses or distractions; they will bundle them up with their very long list of less headline-grabbing concerns, like fitness and fueling and getting off the starting line in adverse current. Then they will manage that bundle, first by identifying the most important concern at any given moment, then by focusing on it—and most importantly, by putting aside anything else in the bundle. Since most of what happens in Rio is outside an athlete’s control, it’s likely that the only time most are thinking about the topics in today’s headlines is when answering a question from the press or the public—with a pre-rehearsed answer.

It will certainly take a little luck to make the podium in Rio. And the best athletes make their own luck: by training hard, having a plan but remaining flexible, and being prepared for anything that might come their way.

There’s a reason an Olympic medal is considered a pinnacle achievement in sport. There’s a reason sailors know Torben Grael’s name—and a reason why Ben Ainslie is now Sir Ben. The ability to focus despite all the distractions that crop up at any Games separates the best of the best from the rest of us. It doesn’t matter if those distractions are as big as a couch floating just downwind of the weather mark, as small as a mosquito buzzing around your head, or as annoying and unavoidable as multiple cameras desperately trying to capture every facial gesture. Even a seemingly tiny and insignificant distraction can keep an athlete off the podium if it’s not managed properly. And as one coach likes to put it, all distractions are tiny and insignificant when a medal is up for grabs.

When the Games begin in 36 days, today’s headlines will all be forgotten. All that will matter then is each athlete’s ability to focus on racing well “on the day”—because that’s what will win a medal at Rio 2016.

8 thoughts on “What Wins Olympic Medals? Not What Wins Headlines”

  1. Jim Titgemeyer says:

    Carol, Thanks for all of your insights and realistic words. You have a great way of separating the BS from the important stuff. Tell Paul hi and stay on the favored side.

    1. Carol Newman Cronin says:

      Jim, thanks for the comment and glad you found the post helpful.

  2. Scott weiss says:

    Nice one carol.
    The ability to focus with all the distractions

    1. Carol Newman Cronin says:

      You know about that better than most!

  3. cj says:

    Carol- Right on. This is a recurring theme for every Olympics now. Write about how badly the snow, preparation, (stadium/housing) construction, (air/water/ sound/radiation/ …) pollution is. Once the games start, all will be forgotten in a blink.

    1. Carol Newman Cronin says:

      I guess it’s a natural reaction. After all, the best Olympic preparation by athletes means the least amount of drama, so there’s not much to write about there that will make an eye-catching headline. Thanks for the comment.

  4. David Shulman says:

    No one is ‘raining’ on the athletes. The ‘rain’ is rightfully landing on those whose DUTY it is to pick a place that affords the best competitors in the world a level and fair opportunity to be recognized as the best. With the embarrassing international soccer payoff disgrace as a background, and the seeming wish to force the Olympics site selection committee to widen its choices, politics has intruded into a venue even further than it has previously gone.

    It’s bad enough that countries created hormone afflicted competitors for the sake of the medal count. Now we have an unfinished series of venues at best, the potential of uneven competition created by poor conditions, and an ill timed outbreak of a disease, which could happen anywhere but which is fostered by the squalor of nearby communities and the waste carried into the competitors living and performing areas.

    We should ALL demand that competition on this level be absolutely as clean and fair as it can be. The athletes of the world, all of whom get older each day (and mostly have just this one shot to be at the top) deserve nothing less.

    1. Carol Newman Cronin says:

      You’ve covered a lot of ground here, and I agree with all of it—especially that the competition should be as fair and clean as it can be.

      Politics is an unfortunate byproduct of visibility, and the Olympics is an extremely visible event—even more so now that we hear about so much of what’s happening behind the scenes. Hopefully Rio 2016 all goes smoothly, and all the scrutiny results in some progress on the larger issues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *